The parameters of a tuned absorber/damper are selected such that their natural frequencies match the disturbance frequency (for tuned absorption) or resonant frequency of a particular mode (for tuned damping) of an structural/acoustic system being treated. In case of tuned damping, as stated before, enough energy absorption (damping) should be built into the tuned damper so that the resonant mode targeted for damping does truly get damped rather than get split into two modes (one with a higher and one with a lower natural frequency of the tuned frequency).
Another important factor directly affecting the effectiveness of tuned absorbers/dampers in both structural and acoustic applications is the size of their inertia elements relative to the size of the structure/acoustic_system they are designed to treat. The larger the inertia element, the more effective the device. The inertia element of the tuned treatment is normally around 1 to 10% of the oscillating inertia they are meant to quiet.
Figure 4 shows the frequency response functions of a structure subject to a 30 Hz perturbation a) with no treatment (green trace), b) treated with a small dynamic vibration absorber (red trace) and c) treated with a large dynamic vibration absorber (black trace). The tuning frequency of dynamic vibration absorbers is the frequency corresponding to the notch on the frequency response function plot of Figure 4, i.e. 30 Hz. Note that the depth of the notch representing the effectiveness of the dynamic vibration absorber increases with increase in its mass.

Figure 4 Frequency response functions of a structure without and with two different tuned vibration absorbers
The width of the notch in Figure 4, presenting the bandwidth of the dynamic absorber, is rather narrow; the narrow bandwidth of dynamic absorber makes the accuracy of its tuning crucial. Although increase in the size of dynamic absorber widens the bandwidth somewhat but it does not diminish the importance of tuning accuracy. The accuracy of tuning becomes even more crucial considering that in addition to the notch (the desirable outcome) dynamic absorber introduces a peak with its resonant frequency very close to the frequency of the notch (the undesirable outcome). A small mis-tuning would match the frequency of the peak (instead of the frequency of the notch) with the perturbing frequency causing the structure to resonate rather becoming quit.
When the frequency of harmonic perturbation matches or is close to the resonant frequency of the structure (or acoustic environment), tuned damping is a more prudent solution than dynamic absorption is. Figure 5 shows the frequency response functions of a structure without any treatment (green trace), treated with a dynamic vibration absorber (red trace) and treated with a tuned mass damper (black trace). The resonant frequency of the structure is 10 Hz.

Figure 5 Frequency response functions of a structure without and with a tuned dynamic absorber and a tuned mass damper both tuned to the natural frequency of the structure
Figure 5 Frequency response functions of a structure without and with a DVA and a TMD both tuned to the natural frequency of the structure
A dynamic absorber is very effective in abating the resonant vibration of its target structure (or oscillation of its target acoustic system) at its tuning frequency corresponding to the notch on the red trace in Figure 5, but it also breaks the single resonant peak of the structure to two neighboring peaks (a phenomenon known as ‘mode splitting’). The presence of these two highly underdamped resonant peaks makes the accuracy of tuning very crucial. As stated earlier, mis-tuning could result in the structure (or acoustic system) resonating ra
ther than becoming quiet. A tuned damper tuned to the same frequency might not be as effective as an equivalent dynamic absorber at the tuning frequency but it has a wider bandwidth and does not split the target mode into two highly underdamped modes; see the black trace in Figure 5.